Christians, Song Of Solomon, And Oral Sex
(June 27, 2008)

God-inspired People Can Make Mistakes

            Christian leaders don’t always operate in the spirit and when they don’t, they are very likely to make mistakes owing to their misunderstanding of an occurrence or scripture resulting in them misguiding God’s people. A Biblical example of misunderstanding is by the anointed man Moses whom God spoke to “… face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend…" (Exodus 33:11). Moses misread the two and one half tribes of Israel (Numbers 32:33) who wanted to live in Gilead for the good grazing land instead of going over the Jordan River to the Promised Land. In misreading their desire, he accused them of not wanting to go to battle with Israel which would discourage Israel from wanting to go over the Jordan and consequently caused Israel to turn away from God. The two-and-one-half tribes told Moses their intent was to build their sheepfolds and cities and then go over the Jordan with the children of Israel.  Sure enough, they lived up to their intent and did not return to their homes until every one of Israel had received his inheritance in the Promised Land.

            The high priest Phinehas, during the time of Joshua, the spirit-filled leader chosen after Moses to lead Israel into Canaan land, moved in his flesh against the same two-and-one-half tribes. After Israel received their inheritance, the two-and-one-half tribes were on their way back to their cities on the other side of Jordan in Gilead when they decided to stop and build an altar to God as a witness between them and those in the Promised Land that the Lord is God (Joshua 22:34). The Israelites in the Promised Land accused the two-and-one-half tribes of trespassing God.  Misunderstanding or misinterpreting the two-and-one-half tribes’ desires and intents shows that God-inspired people are not all the time one hundred percent perfect in their decisions and counsel, and in due course misguide others.         
            Eli the judge of Israel saw Hannah in the temple praying before The Lord and he accused her of being drunk when she was instead crying her heart out to God for a child (I Samuel 1:12-15). Eli’s assumption of Hannah being drunk was false.  He completely misunderstood what was going on with Hannah. During Jesus’ time, right before His horrible death, Apostle Peter said he’d never be offended by his relationship with Messiah and that he would never deny him (Matthew 26:35). Sure enough, caught up in the flesh, he denied Jesus three times (Matthew 26:70-74). Peter, living along side the Son of God, in fleshly frailty, proved the capableness of men of God making mistakes. Church of Jesus Christ, it’s wholly possible for people in God’s service, thinking they’re in the spirit when they’re in the flesh, to make mistakes by misunderstanding occurrences and scripture, and as a result incorrectly advise others about God’s Word and His expectations of mankind. Flesh does sometimes, more often than not, operate in so-called Godly leaders and they end up making mistakes by giving out the wrong advice. (Jesus was the only exception.)

Song Of Solomon Is An Old Testament Mistake

            A mistake was made by so-called God-inspired men who saw fit to include in the Old Testament Canon the Song of Solomon, also known as “Song of Songs” and “Canticles.” There are three divisions in the Old Testament canon:  (1) The Law; (2) The Prophets; and (3) Hagiographa, or “The Writings.”  The Song of Solomon is in the Writings and its canonicity was doubted for a long time before its inclusion as well as after. Its canonicity was questioned not only because of its erotic language, but also because it makes no mention of God Himself, His glory nor expressives conveying who God is, where He is, and what He wants such as the ark, the sanctuary, sacrificial offering, blessing, sin, holiness, etc.  Those are just some of the terms that would appear in the Song of Solomon if it truly was a reciprocal love message between God and Believers. There is also the difficulty in giving interpretation that lends doubt to its canonicity. Saints of God, it was doubted because of its worldly and sensual nature. There would have been no doubt concerning its canonicity had it genuinely originated with God.  Was it a Jewish writing or as some Bible scholars believe, a Syrian or Egyptian love song, or even a melodrama, all proving that it most certainly had been written long after King Solomon’s death? Even the Jewish Talmud credits the writer of the Song of Solomon as someone other than Solomon which is also like to be incorrect.

Hezekiah and his colleagues wrote…the Song of Songs [Song of Solomon]…” (The Babylonian Talmud. Seder Nezikin, Vol II, Baba Bathra 15a. Rabbi I. Epstein, ed. London: The Soncino Press. P 71, 1978.)
 

This convinces one to believe that the Song of Solomon is as much a pseudo writing as “Odes of Solomon,” “Psalms of Solomon,” and “Testament of Solomon,” all pseudepigrapha writings.   

            Face it, the Bible is not free from errors in the sense that it has incorporated pseudo writings (both Old and New Testaments). True, God’s Word is inerrant – that which is truly God’s Word, but the Bible has in it writings that clearly are not God-inspired such as the Song of Solomon, and that makes the Bible flawed. Church, tons of Hebrew writings were produced during the 400 years between Malachi and Jesus known as the Intertestamental  or the “silent” period when God was not speaking through His prophets to the Jewish people. In fact, there were no prophets in Israel! (According to Holman Bible Dictionary, Malachi’s time was postexilic – after 536 B.C. because of the use of the Persian word for governor in 1:8.)   There were no prophets in Israel during the Intertestamental period because the Jewish people had been in total rebellion and consequently in bondage under Persian, Greek, and Roman rules. (Though Cyrus gave the edict for the Jews to go back to Jerusalem and rebuild their temple, they were still under Persian rule until the Greeks defeated the Persians sometime between 333 and 331 BC.) During the Intertestamental time, the
 

Jews did not stop writing for centuries between the Old Testament and the New. The Intertestamental  Period was a time of much literary production. We designate these writings as Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha…They did not attain canonical status, but some of them were cited by early Christians almost on a level with the Old Testament writings, and a few were copied in biblical manuscripts. Some New Testament authors were familiar with various non-canonical works, and the Epistle of Jude [Jude 14-15] made specific reference to at least one of these books. They were ultimately preserved by the Christians rather than by the Jews (Butler, Trent C., ed. Holman Bible Dictionary. Nashville, TN: Holman Bible Publishers, 1991, p 69).
 

The Jewish writers not only habitually assigned their writings to anybody famous for writing, but it was also common for them to give a famous-name writer to writings found without a writer’s name.  Thus you have pseudonymous or lying works attributed to Biblical greats such as Moses, Adam, Enoch, Abraham, Joseph, Solomon, and the list goes on.  Do remember that there are only two voices in the world, and if God wasn’t speaking to Israel during that time, then it had to have been the other voice – Satan.     
 

…the date and authorship of the books of the Old Testament is exceedingly complicated….due in large measure to the fact that the ancient Hebrews were not governed by the literary customs that have been developed in the Western World.  The claims of authorship are sacred with us, but this was not so with them….One writer did not hesitate to add to the work of another, or to incorporate the work of another in his own.  This he did with no thought of plagiarism, but simply as following a common custom which was universally regarded as perfectly legitimate.  Sometimes one would write in the name of another, usually some well-known character of the past (Harrell, Costen J. “The Bible: Its Origin and Growth.” Nashville: Cokesbury Press. p 77, 1926).

You can bet your life that this kind of literary deceit wasn’t prevalent during the times of Moses, the judges, and prophets.  It happened when God had stopped speaking to Israel through the prophets during the Intertestamental period.
 

            Disappointment came when Mr. Harrell went on to say in so many words that God overlooked the literary deceit.           

The Holy Spirit did not set aside the literary customs of the day when He led men of old to write the thoughts of God.  The Bible is a Divine—human book – a divine message cast in human mold.  The matter of authorship does not bring in question the integrity of the Bible.  It is simply a question of ancient literary custom and practice, and in no sense invalidates the Word of God which standeth sure (Ibid. p 77).

How far from the truth! “The matter of authorship does not bring in question the integrity of the Bible”? Think for a moment about the person of God. First of all, He is “holy.”  He is “truth.”  He cannot lie and if He can’t lie, He will never compromise his integrity, which is His Word, the Bible.  If He quit speaking to Israel because of their sin, why would He overlook their sin of literary deceit in supposedly God-inspired writings and use them in spite of just to get His Word out?  No way in Heaven! God isn’t desperate that He’ll “settle” for just anybody. He might as well have used Satan and his demons to get His Word out, which He’d never ever do.  God didn’t lead those men to sin by producing fraudulent works and accepted them as of Him.

            Dear Church, God is the same when it comes to His High Holy moral code of conduct and His Word regardless of the dispensation. He is not about deceit and would not and did not overlook the practice of the Jews bootlegging other folk’s names and works because that was the custom.  Lewd behavior in Sodom and Gomorrah was the custom, too, but did God overlook it?  You are at this moment being made aware of the literary deceit because God did consider the literary customs of that time for the mere reason that literary deceit – lying and thieving – is not in His character and makes what is supposed to be a written word from Him questionable because of the false identifying label.  Why should God, who alone is God, and who thrives on uprightness, compromise Himself with the dishonest practice of literary deceit?  No way would God be in cahoots with such a scheme. Jewish literary deceit was not overlooked by God who is so righteous.
 

The problems of date and authorship, present everywhere in the Old Testament, come particularly to the fore in ‘The Writings,’ the third and last division of the Old Testament Canon (Harrell, Costen J. “The Bible: Its Origin and Growth.” Nashville: Cokesbury Press. pp 77-78, 1926).

As Costen Harrell went on to say, dates and authorship are more of a problem in “The Writings” (Hagiographa) where sits the Song of Solomon. Brothers and Sisters, what the Jewish writers did is a cruel example of deceit for which Christians have been suffering the consequences to this very day.  The aftermath of it is false teachings from both Old and New Testaments in today’s Christianity.      
  

            Song of Solomon should never have been accepted as canon.  There is absolutely nothing in it that points out spirituality.    It should have been rejected in the Christian Bible just like other apocrypha and pseudepigrapha works were rejected. Fault lies in Christians for believing that the Jewish rabbis can do no wrong when it comes to knowing all there is about the Word of God.
 

Rabbi Akiba silenced debate with the words: ‘No one in Israel has ever doubted that the Song of Songs defiles the hands [Talmudic meaning belongs in canon]. For no day in the history of the world is worth the day when the Song of Songs was given to Israel.  For all the Hagiographa [The Writings] are holy, but the Song of Solomon is a holy of the holies….’  …every one knew that the doubt had been great and the dispute long over this book, but Akiba was of great authority and thus the debate was closed (An American Commentary on The Old Testament. “The Song of Songs.”  George E. Merrill. Philadelphia: The American Baptist Publication Society. p viii, 1905).

            God forbid Song of Solomon “a holy of holies”! Rabbi Akiba spoke that in 90 A.D. in Jamnia (Jabneh) where a group of rabbis convened and made known the completion of the Old Testament Canon which meant nothing else could be added. Think on these two things:  (1) 90 A.D. was not too long after the crucifixion of Our Lord; (2) With the Jews’ temple having been destroyed and them off in Diaspora, God’s Holy Spirit still WAS NOT moving in Judaism, and by then had not been for more than 400 years.  Therefore, how were those rabbis God-inspired to decide that the very erotic Song of Solomon, with absolutely no mention of God, be included in the Old Testament cannon for allegorical interpretation? The author, Gladden said it best:   

By such a plain tale do we put down the fiction, so widely disseminated, that the canon of the Old Testament was ‘fixed’ long before the time of Christ, and, presumably, by inspired men. It was not ‘fixed,’ even in Palestine, until sixty years after our Lord's death; several of the books were in dispute during the whole apostolic period, and these are the very books which are not referred to in the New Testament. Whether the men who finally ‘fixed’ it were exceptionally qualified to judge of the ethical and spiritual values of the writings in question may be doubted. They were the kind of men who slew our Lord and persecuted his followers. When we are asked what are our historical reasons for believing that Esther and Ecclesiastes and Solomon's Song are sacred books and ought to be in the Old Testament canon, let us answer: It is not because any prophet or inspired person adjudged them to be sacred, for no such person had anything to say about them; it is not because our Lord and his apostles indorsed them, for they do not even mention them; it is not because they held a place in a collection of Sacred Scriptures used by our Lord and his apostles, for their position in that collection was in dispute at that time; it is because the chief priests and scribes who rejected Christ pronounced them sacred. (Gladden, Washington. “Who Wrote The Bible?” New York: Houghton, Mifflin and Company. 1891, pp 309-10).

Song of Solomon is not an allegory of revered love between God and His people.  The rabbis at Jamnia were not God-inspired nor God-appointed to finalize what should be in the Old Testament Canon, more particularly, the Song of Solomon. If mistakes could be made on the part of spirit-filled men whom God had not turned His back on, the greater the likelihood of those God-uninspired rabbis having made a colossal mistake when they decided to make the Song of Solomon a book in the Old Testament Canon. After Malachi, no rabbi can claim to have been God-inspired in making decisions about which writings should be in the Old Testament Canon. The fact that the Song of Solomon is found in all Hebrew manuscripts does not validate it being of God and belongs in the Old Testament Canon. (How can you take the word of rabbis who to this very day are responsible for their people remaining in darkness by teaching that Jesus is not the Jewish Messiah?)
 

Song Of Solomon An Allegory?
 

            Song of Solomon is sexual love between an unmarried man and woman that supposedly has a spiritual message behind it describing the relationship between the God and Israel His wife, and Jesus Christ and His bride the Church. If God wants the unmarried to abstain from sex, why would He go against His moral teaching by giving His believers a spiritual Word through an erotic message illustrated by two unmarried people as in the Song of Solomon?  That is not the God of Israel and Song of Solomon is not about betrothment of God to Believers. 

            There is no spiritual design to the Song of Solomon.  Had the Song been of God in the first place, why did the Jewish rabbis advise their young people not to read it until they were 30 years old? God has no such ruling concerning His Word because it would deprive certain categories of people from spiritually benefiting from a supposedly great God-inspired work.  The rabbis prohibited its reading for those under thirty years old because the poem is entirely too sexual – out-and-out pornographic. God had nothing to do with the Song of Solomon.

            If Song of Solomon had actually been written by Solomon,
 

…whatever Solomon may have been as the type of Christ from his being the son of David and the ruler of Israel, his relations to his harem and to the lascivious customs that his introduction of idolatry brought into his court are far away from anything that could be found in the nature of Christianity…in his [Solomon’s] age he was one of the greatest of voluptuaries.  And his success in winning this maiden of the poem, which this interpretation requires, is only the addition of one more favorite to the number of those already within his palace.  Where is the spiritual or moral lesson in this, and where can any parallelism be found between it and the relations of Christ and his bride as they are portrayed in the New Testament? How can it be that a poem that introduces a royal voluptuary as its hero, that makes the addition of another wife to the seven hundred [I Kings 11:1-3] or more already in his harem the main theme, that paints the excesses of his court, the intrigues and jealousies of his palace, and sets forth graphically the feelings of the lovers toward each other in such surroundings – how can it be that such a poem portrays the relations of Christ to his church, or of Christ to the individual soul (An American Commentary on The Old Testament. “The Song of Songs.”  George E. Merrill. Philadelphia: The American Baptist Publication Society. P viii, 1905).

There is positively no spiritual lesson in the Song of Solomon and most certainly no moral lesson.  This love poem, drama, wedding song, allegory, or whatever you want to label it, bears no relation to God and Israel His Wife nor Jesus and His bride the Church.  When Jesus was on this earth, He was not about a life of luxury and sensual pleasures, so, how can that piece of work be symbolical of Jesus and His Bride the Church? God’s love for Believers and the Believers love for God with heart, mind, soul, and strength cannot be allegorize through fleshly erotic love between a man and a woman and his harem of 700 wives and 300 concubines (1 Kings 11:3).  God forbid!

            Allegorical writings tend to give a clue that it is such and they go through a story giving an end and an answer, which the Song of Solomon does not do. Where the Bible speaks of God and His wife Israel; and Jesus and His bride the Church, the reader recognizes a spiritual covenant – a heavenly agreement with mankind, and where referred to as that, it is made clear what is meant by it spiritually and gives an answer for change.  Whether the Old Testament wife or the New Testament bride, it is about the faithfulness of the Father and the Son to the Believers or the unfaithfulness of Believers toward the Father and the Son as it is spelled out in the writing. The erotic language in Song of Solomon in no way compares to the language God uses when giving spiritual messages concerning the love relationship between Him and His people as He declared Himself jealous, or the people to be whores or adulterers.  Even places where He said He would show their nakedness didn’t mean nudity but means Him revealing their sins for all to see.  (Examples are in Ex 20:5; 34:15-16 = Lev 20:5-6; 17:7 = Hosea 1-3 = Isa 49:14-21; 50; 54:5-6; 62:4-5 = Jer 3:1-4 = Eze 16; 23.) Nowhere else in the Bible can you compare God’s love gestures to what’s in the Song of Solomon. Church, there is nothing spiritual about the Song of Solomon so stop believing it’s of God.

            Dear Brothers and Sisters, showing reciprocal love between God and Believers in their whole heart, mind, soul, and strength as the ultimate in the covenant is not illustrated through perverted and erotic sex.  Whatever happened to the ultimate expression of love being to “lay down one’s life” as did Christ? God is not some lewd personality who gets a charge out of anything sexual, so why would He, who is above Satan, stoop to Satan’s level by illustrating lewd love between Him and the people who live for Him and serve Him?  Never! God is not a pervert and that bears repeating. God is not a pervert!  May Almighty God forgive you for believing that of Him.  It goes to show that you who call yourselves the Church, don’t know the God you claim to love and serve.  You never challenged the Song of Solomon because at some time someone said it was of God and that the Bible is inerrant so you took it at face value.  Well, the Bible is with error when it comes to certain works that are not God-inspired, such as the Song of Solomon, but inerrant in relation to works that are truly “God-inspired.”

Song Of Solomon, Christian Counselors, And Oral Sex

Example of fellatio or the woman using her mouth to stimulate the man’s penis to ejaculate into her mouth:  “As the apple tree among the trees of the wood, so is my beloved among the sons. I sat down under his shadow with great delight, and his fruit was sweet to my taste” (Song of Solomon 2:3).

Example of cunnilingus or the man using his mouth to lick the woman’s vulva:  “Awake, O north wind; and come, thou south; blow upon my garden, that the spices thereof may flow out. Let my beloved come into his garden, and eat his pleasant fruits” (Song of Solomon 4:16).

Example of instructions for the couple to freely eat one another’s reproductive organs: “I am come into my garden, my sister, my spouse: I have gathered my myrrh with my spice; I have eaten my honeycomb with my honey; I have drunk my wine with my milk: eat, O friends; drink, yea, drink abundantly, O beloved” (Song of Solomon 5:1).

Church, you need to stop thinking or believing that you can’t be misled by so-called Christian leaders because you most certainly have been when it comes to the Song of Solomon. You are deceived! As long as you’re encased in that body called flesh, you can be deceived.  No, don’t even think for one moment that God will never permit that to happen to you: God does allow deceiving demons to operate around all human beings including those who supposedly are spiritually-wise enough to recognize them and their deception and thwart their demonic intent. But, hey, there is no recognizing deception if you don’t know God, His Word, have a strong prayer life, and walk in holiness. Escaping deception is all in your hands as one with free will, but if you can’t recognize it, you will be misled with only yourself to blame. 

            On May 9, 2008, Dr. Doug Weiss, a supposed Christian sex therapist (if there is such), was guest on Daystar television’s “Celebration” program.  A caller into the station asked if oral sex was okay and Mr. Weiss’ answer was that oral sex is okay as long as it’s consensual.  I was flabbergasted!  Truthfully, I could hardly catch my breath behind his answer that was being televised live across the globe.  To top that off, Joni Lamb, co-host of the show and co-owner of the network chimed in “The Song of Solomon” as if to confirm that the oral sex-act is Biblical.  Brothers and Sisters, this is apostasy! This is what Christianity has come to. This is what so-called Christian television has come to – Christians – accepting perverted sex as the norm.

            Still in disbelief, wanting confirmation on Weiss’ misguided answer to Christians, I went to the internet to learn whatever else was out there on this Doug Weiss. Sure enough, I got the confirmation I was looking for. In “New Man Magazine” online, the question to the so-called Christian sex doctor, Doug Weiss was:
 

My wife doesn’t want to perform oral sex on me. Am I wrong to want it? If  not, what should I say to her (New Man Magazine online.  “My Wife Doesn’t Like Oral Sex!.  Doug Weiss.  No date. Retrieved 10 May 2008. http://www.newmanmagazine.com)?

It’s clear that this so-called Christian Counselor condones oral sex if one is married because his response to the question emphasized that oral sex as well as other sex acts are sin if the couple isn’t married. O-k-a-y.  What Christian-sex-doctor Weiss means is, all perverted sex is okay as long as you’re married and oral sex is okay, too, as long as you’re married. He then went on to say that
 

…if you lovingly discuss this issue together, and you and your wife mutually enjoy a sex act, then you are in agreement….Maybe one day she will change her mind, but it's never a good idea to force the issue.” (Ibid.). 
 

Church, married or not, oral sex is perverted sex and perverted sex is sin.  Marriage is to prevent impurity; not a license issued to engage in lewd and perverted sex acts that defile the marriage bed.  Being that God’s definition of sex is wholly different from Satan’s, there are limits to godly sex. Perverted sexual acts are Satan’s ideas and they are sin but Dr. Doug Weiss says
 

if  you have God’s permission and you want to experiment [sexually] and you’re both comfortable with what is being suggested…, you can then experiment (New Man Magazine. “Ask The Sex Doc. September/October 2007, p 44).

This so-called God-inspired man is himself so deceived. Get God’s permission!  What kind of foolishness is that? That kind of foolish advice is of the devil and so is Dr. Doug Weiss.  How would you look going before the Lord for permission to sin? “Uh, Lord can we engage in oral sex”? Makes no demonic sense at all. Doug Weiss’ counsel is genuinely devilish just like him.  He is no more a man of God than the “man in the moon.” Weiss’ training in psychology has supplanted his theological training as well as his Christianity.

            Atypical or deviant sex acts are generated by demon spirits of perversion who, incidentally, are very, very cruel.  Talking about sin “taking one farther than they want to go”! Once those cruel demons of perversion get the couple to engage in oral sex, soon after, that will not be pleasurable enough and the move will be to the next level up in order to enjoy sex, supposedly.  So, what’s the next kinky sex-act to be served on the filthy plate of perversion after having eaten each others reproductive organs like a gourmet meal served on a piece of fine china?  (Nauseating!) Anal sex? Three-party sex? Sadomasochism? Maybe even same-sex?  What’s next? Those demons of perversion don’t know when to stop. Will you get permission from God for the rest of the perverted acts?  The feeling that “there has to be something else” to fulfill the burning urge for gratification becomes overpowering because those perverted demons are not about to give anyone a break once they have been allowed to enter into the picture.  As the saying goes: Sin will take you farther than you want to go, keep you longer than you want to stay, and cost you more than you want to pay.  The cruel demons of perversion don’t let up; they just get more and more perverted.  Worse and worse you become.  Perverted sexual acts will drive you to a state lower than a whale’s belly in the bottom of the ocean.  That’s low! That is deep, deep sin!

            Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled…” (Hebrews 13:4).      
Perverted sex defiles the marriage bed because it’s immoral! It’s vicious! Nasty! Sadistic! It doesn’t express true love that is sweet and precious when sex for covenanted partners should be sweeter than just a fleshly high in the most bizarre form of physical “jollies.” Such inordinate show of love between husband and wife is beyond the “line in the sand.” It isn’t sweet because it’s morally out of order in God’s sexual intercourse design. As all Christians are to be free from evil they are to be free from perverted sex.  Perverted sex is not holy and as Christians you’re supposed to be holy people as God says He is holy (Leviticus 11:44, Numbers 15:40). If you are bought out and sold out to Jesus, the devil will not be able to entice you with such perverted sex acts that defile your marriage bed.

            This doesn’t end with Dr. Doug Weiss.  There are numerous so-called Christian websites offering a blessing on oral sex.  Sexinchrist.com does a take on Judah’s son, Onan, who spilled his seed in Genesis 38:9 to keep from getting Tamar, his dead brother’s wife pregnant.  The web site “Sex In Christ” says that Onan should have ejaculated into Tamar’s mouth and for her to have swallowed it so that Onan’s sperm would not have spilled on the ground as it did and angered God.  My Lord!  Nauseating! Demonic! How far from the truth! It’s clear that this unknown writer’s website, supposedly Christian, is a tool of the devil. This site even went so far as to interpret the living water-reference of Jesus and the woman at the well (John 4:7-16) as semen that “provides a spiritual replenishment for the soul.”  The writer also said that Jesus was going to instruct the lady on how to do oral sex and swallow semen. There is nothing spiritually endearing about a man ejaculating into a woman’s mouth that God would illustrate it anywhere in the Bible.  It’s perversion! It looks like the work of the devil and it the work of the devil. To hell with that website!  May the unknown writer at Sexinchrist.com burn in hell!  The act of oral sex does not have a “green light” from Heaven permitting Christians to indulge in.  God is sick of this unholiness among those who call themselves His people.

            You must not believe the lie that consensual oral sex between husband and wife is acceptable before God. If oral sex is okay to engage in because it’s so “normal,” why would the couple question one another about engaging in the act or ask God for His permission to do so? Why wouldn’t they just automatically go for it? They wouldn’t because it’s abnormal.  It’s perversion and as long as you retain the belief that it’s permissible, you are in sin.  Do you honestly believe Jesus condones such perversion? This Doctor Doug Weiss and others like him, all supporters of oral sex amongst Christians, are in a real mess.  To think, folks like that are out on the marriage seminar-circuit misguiding God’s people with such hellish teaching.

Conclusion

            People have to breathe, eat, and drink water, but people don’t have to have sex, much less perverted sex.  Jesus proved that people don’t have to have sex when He was on the earth, in the flesh, and that is not to say that copulation between husband and wife doesn’t have to be or that it’s of the devil.  Sexual intercourse is not perverted and nor is it of the devil unless it’s done outside of marriage. There is nothing shameful or sinful about sex between a husband and wife unless it is perverted.

            Perverted sex plays to the mind and to the flesh and oral sex in the lives of married Christian couples is clearly the influence of demons. Oral sex is along side the other sexual perversions of incest, anal sex, rape, orgies, homosexuality, bestiality, masturbation, wet dreams, lust, adultery, fornication, and so on.  When so-called Christian couples take part in such acts they are saying “no” to the sexually moral act of intercourse as ordained by God.  They are telling God that they will have nothing to do with His prescribed morally clean sex act for married couples.    

            Creative sex which is nothing but perverted, sex may feel good, but it is quite a spiritual risk to take for a fleeting thrill.  It’s sin and God will have none of that, even if a so-called Christian counselor or minister of the Gospel counsels it as being okay if it’s in the marriage bed. To engage in such makes you the servant of sin (John 8:34). Though the so-called Christian counselors condone perverted sex acts between married couples by saying “as long as it’s consensual,” God is calling those very same sex acts by their correct names – perverted.  Perverted because there is nothing in them that spells ‘love’. Perverted sex acts are not done in the name of love but perversion.

            If as a couple currently engaging in the perverted oral sex-act, and you don’t feel that it’s wrong because you have no conviction about it, that’s because you have convinced yourself that you haven’t sinned against God.  You are convinced that if your engaging in the act was sinful, surely as a Christian, you would have had heavy conviction or intervention directly from God’s Holy Spirit telling you, “my child, don’t do that; it’s a sin.”  That’s what you’re waiting on – a voice rising up in you telling you it’s not okay. Well, that’s not going to happen because it’s not an everyday thing that God speaks to people above and beyond their conscience. Hence as you wait for that voice you will find yourself waiting forever and will go deeper in your sin of perversion.  On the other hand, if you hear a voice giving you the green light to engage or red light to not engage, then you are hearing the voice of the deceiver because you were waiting on a voice instead of letting your conscience be your guide or allowing yourself to be corrected by your conscience. 

            As for conviction, it comes when the conscience wasn’t able to get through to the person, and not always then.  Very good examples of conviction are in Psalms 32:1-5, 38:2-11, 51; 2 Samuel 24:1-10.  When conviction comes upon you, you experience the heaviness of God’s hand upon you. Your heart (spirit) is smitten whereby suddenly you are afflicted – you are mentally troubled. You have no rest in your being for you are totally disturbed.  There is disquietness in your spirit – an uneasiness or restlessness.  All of that and more until you acknowledge your sin and confess before the Lord in a repentant fashion whereby you will not sin like that ever again. That’s conviction! 

            Brothers and Sisters, there is a word for you as you await heavy conviction or after sin and that word is: CONSCIENCE! CONSCIENCE! CONSCIENCE! The primary guide to your behavior is your conscience.  Your conscience is your moral discernment – understanding of what is morally right and what is morally wrong. Discerning what is morally right versus wrong is first learned in your home environment; learned second in the Word of God as you received Him and began to know Him and His expectations of you as a Christian; and learned third with the aid of the Holy Spirit who brings the Word of God to your remembrance whereby you choose to do what is morally right as you shun the wrong. That’s how one’s conscience is developed.

 One of the things your soul houses is your conscience which is where you make moral decisions respecting the kind of life you live. Before there is ever conviction of sin, you will have already (1) had the thought in your mind and (2) made the choice to implement it or not.   
 

Evil spirits get the man to drop the active exercise of conscience for an inward conviction.  He is taught that to follow the voice of the Spirit is superior to following the voice of conscience – the one is ‘natural’ and the other ‘spiritual.’ Hence he will ignore conscience and even suppress it, believing that he has a superior power to guide his life.  All this is ‘ground’ upon which evil spirits can enter as accusers….Gradually they [evil spirits] establish themselves in the believer in place of the Holy Spirit, and he comes under the convictions of evil spirits, thinking it is Divine conviction.  By yielding to these convictions the soul unwittingly comes under the guidance of evil spirits, and they are then able to make him feel right when he is wrong, and wrong when he is right. They act instead of his conscience… (Usher, Charles H. “How To Deliver Souls From Deception And Possession.” Brighton, England: W.T. Moulton & Co., Ltd. 1921, p 50).   

Brothers and Sisters, before you get to the point of conviction, there is already a mechanism in place called “conscience” to aid you in averting sin. The conscience is fed the righteousness of the Lord through your daily communing with the Him and daily feeding on His Word – the Bible.  If you’ll just stay in the Lord, He will remain in you and there will be no will to engage in perverted sex acts not approved by Him. You will be repulsed by them and no longer see them as being right when they’re wrong.    

            Seek someone to pray deliverance over you from perverted sex acts, omitting so-called Christian counselor with a lot of letters behind the name. First of all ask the person who will pray the deliverance prayer if they believe Christians engaging in Oral sex are defiling the marriage bed and if the answer is no, run from them as fast as you can and search out someone else to pray the prayer of deliverance over you.